![]() ![]() Furthermore, not only are said creatures inconsistent with "these skeletons on this page", but said skeletons are inconsistent with "the fossil skeletons on which based." More specifically, "it feels like.the creatures in the mind of a concerned parent whose only knowledge of comes from the films of the 30s and the 50s" (& thus, has "more in common with medieval bestiaries, conjured from rumor and imagination alone"). The parts around 14:00 & 17:00 remind me of the Holtz quote below. I'm surprised said series isn't mentioned by name. ![]() The part around 13:00 reminds me of the "I Love Dinosaurs" series. Instead, in this review, I'll point you to Trish/Talcott's BB review & add my own thoughts as well: ![]() ), that I can't possibly top it, so I won't even try. ![]() However, I then remembered that Trish/Talcott's BB review is so perfect, especially when it comes to criticizing BB's art & message (. I was originally planning on reviewing Stan/Jan's "The Berenstain Bears and the Dinosaurs" (henceforth BB) the way I usually review bad dino books. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |